Services
This page is intentionally written for Design & Build delivery. The emphasis is on contractor-friendly outputs, coordination discipline and documentation that holds up during construction.
D&B projects are driven by deadlines, procurement, RFIs and construction sequencing. We structure outputs so that packages can be issued, checked, revised and re-issued without chaos.
Design & Build phases
Choose only the phase where you need capacity. Or keep us on the project end-to-end as a dedicated external BIM cell.
Fast, structured outputs that help you price, validate scope and reduce bid risk.
Production-grade Revit work that maintains consistency across disciplines and revisions.
Reliable sheets and schedules that adapt to RFIs, substitutions and on-site constraints.
How cooperation works
The goal is to make nearshore support feel like a predictable internal function: clear inputs, clear outputs, and a repeatable QA/QC rhythm.
DWG/PDF, existing Revit files, employer templates, coordination rules, and package priorities. If information is incomplete, we highlight gaps as “decision points” rather than silently guessing.
We use a practical QA/QC checklist aimed at minimizing rework and site confusion: view naming, sheet consistency, model hygiene, schedules alignment and revision clarity.
CAD/PDF, existing Revit files, templates, issue lists. QA/QC focuses on model hygiene, sheet consistency and schedule accuracy.
FAQ
These answers are tuned for Design & Build delivery — tender speed, construction changes, and coordination discipline.
Yes. Many Design & Build teams use us for tender packages: model setup, early schedules and coordination snapshots. If you win the bid, we can continue into detailed and construction phases or hand over cleanly.
We use revision discipline: change logs per package, consistent sheet updates, and explicit “what changed and why” notes so your site and procurement teams can react without confusion.
We support ARCH/STR/MEP. If you already have internal discipline leads, we integrate as a production cell under their standards. If not, we propose a practical structure and keep responsibilities transparent.
At minimum: CAD/PDF + markups, project scope and package priorities. Revit files and templates help but are not required. If critical information is missing, we list decision points instead of guessing.
We align to your cadence (weekly is typical): federated views/exports, structured issue lists (owners + deadlines), and a short coordination summary after each sync.
Yes. We build contractor-friendly sheets and schedules that reflect work packages and are maintainable across revisions, not “pretty drawings” that break after two changes.
Package orientation, revision clarity and coordination discipline. Outputs are structured so teams can issue, re-issue and track changes without losing control of sheets and schedules.
Yes. We can work inside your environment (templates, naming, CDE rules). If you prefer a lighter setup, we can deliver agreed packages while keeping the same naming and revision conventions.
By enforcing an issue workflow: consistent clash checks, explicit owners, deadlines and status. The goal is to make “coordination” an operating routine, not a crisis event.
Yes. We build practical families and templates that speed production and keep schedules predictable, while staying aligned with your internal standards.
When required, yes. We agree what “as-built” means for your project (scope and evidence) and update models accordingly, including sheets/schedules if needed.
Start depends on scope and current load, but the onboarding itself is lightweight: short brief, sample package rules, and a first deliverable plan. Contact us with your timeline and priorities.
No. This page targets Design & Build delivery specifically: tender speed, package releases, construction change response, and coordination discipline.
Typically: a defined package output (model updates, sheets, schedules) plus a short coordination summary (issues, owners, decisions). Exact cadence depends on your internal workflow.
Yes, but transparently. We mark assumptions, list decision points, and separate “known” from “to be confirmed” so tender and construction teams don’t inherit hidden risks.
We support documentation and coordination in Revit aligned with build packages. Final engineering responsibility and approvals stay with your appointed designers/engineers unless agreed otherwise.
By limiting uncontrolled content, keeping naming predictable, applying repeatable view/sheet rules, and performing QA/QC gates before releases.
We can support coordination workflows by consolidating inputs, tracking issues and keeping a clear issue log. Direct stakeholder management stays with your project leadership unless you request otherwise.
Yes — tender only, detailed only, or construction change response. We scope around your packages and deadlines.
Yes. We produce contractor-friendly sheets and schedules designed to survive revisions.
With a cadence (typically weekly) and an issue workflow: owners, deadlines, statuses.
Contact
Share: project location, phase (tender/detailed/construction), disciplines (ARCH/STR/MEP), inputs (DWG/PDF/Revit), and what must be delivered first. We reply with a clear plan of outputs and coordination rhythm.
Phone & messengers
+48 536-198-779
Tel / Viber / Telegram / WhatsApp — quick response in English or Polish.
vialtim@gmail.com
Attach PDFs, DWGs or Revit files and mention: Design & Build BIM Revit (EU).