1) Architectural Revit modeling
Production modeling aligned to your template and office conventions.
- Model organization (levels, grids, phases, views)
- Design development modeling + refinements
- Model hygiene for downstream documentation
This page is written specifically for architecture practices in the European Union. We help you ship reviewable Revit outputs: structured models, drawings, details, and clean handovers that fit your office standards. The goal is simple—your architects stay focused on design decisions while we take on the production load.
We do not sell “generic BIM”. We deliver specific Revit outputs that match how architecture teams actually work: iterative design, external consultants, review cycles, and documentation deadlines.
Production modeling aligned to your template and office conventions.
Drawings created from the model with stable review logic.
Interfaces with consultants (STR/MEP) without chaos in your model.
Convert legacy sets into a structured Revit baseline.
Point clouds to Revit for refurbishment and retrofit projects.
Content support that reduces friction in production and documentation.
Architecture offices typically use us in one of three situations:
We deliver from Wrocław, Poland (EU) with collaboration designed for EU architecture teams: time-zone overlap, English communication, and a workflow that respects your office standards.
Optional industry background: buildingSMART International.
The fastest outsourcing is often the messiest. We prefer a reviewable cadence: smaller packages, clear acceptance criteria, and QA gates aligned to how lead architects review work.
We align on what you need to approve: model baseline, drawing subset, detail pack, or as-built baseline.
We work in your Revit template/naming. If you don’t have one, we define a minimal pilot structure to avoid rework.
You review, we iterate. The objective is predictable progress, not last-minute bulk delivery.
Clean models, stable sheets, and a structure your team can continue without “cleanup week”.
If you are unsure what to send, start with a representative sample rather than a perfect package.
For renovation projects, we also agree on element categories and assumptions boundaries before production.
Instead of vague promises, choose deliverable packs. Each pack is designed to be reviewable and compatible with your office workflow.
A stable architectural model structure that your team can build on, with predictable views and a clean browser organization.
A documentation subset (or full set) produced directly in Revit, aligned to your sheet logic and review habits.
A renovation-ready baseline built from imperfect reality: scans, point clouds, DWGs and PDFs—made usable for design.
Quality is not “beautiful 3D”. It is whether your team can review, approve, and continue without friction.
If you already use an internal checklist, we mirror it. If not, we propose a lightweight checklist based on your deliverables.
Answers to practical questions from architects who want predictable nearshore delivery without losing control over standards.
Yes. The best pilots are representative: one zone, one documentation subset, or one as-built baseline. We align on acceptance criteria first, then ship a reviewable pack you can approve quickly.
Yes. We prefer using your existing template, browser structure and naming conventions. If you lack formal standards, we define a minimal, conflict-free structure for the pilot and refine it based on your team’s feedback.
Typical scopes include residential, offices, logistics, industrial, public buildings and renovation projects. We adapt deliverables to your stage (concept/DD/CD/as-built) and the review cadence of your stakeholders.
Yes. We convert DWG/PDF and scan/point cloud data into a structured Revit baseline and prepare views/sheets that make stakeholder review easier. For imperfect inputs, we agree on element categories and tolerances before production.
We collaborate under NDAs when required and follow common EU data-protection practices. Exchanges can happen via your CDE or secure file-based workflow. Access control remains on your side.
Send: stage, outputs, deadline milestones, and sample inputs (template or sample sheets are ideal). We reply with a delivery plan and a simple QA gate setup aligned to your review routine.
Share the project stage, location, expected outputs (model/drawings/as-built), milestone dates and available inputs. We will respond with a practical workflow proposal and the closest feasible start.
If you need a country-specific page (e.g., Germany-only architects, Benelux-only), keep the same engine and vary modules + data arrays per file.